Public Pension Funding and U.S. Capital Formation: A Medium- Run View and Discussions
نویسنده
چکیده
Questions about capital formation and the implications of a potentially increasing scarcity of financial capital in the United States have recently emerged as important public issues, not just as a matter of long~range planning but as an object of concern in ~the medium run, too. There are reasons for expecting both the overall scarcity of investment capital and, perhaps more importantly, the relative scarcity of long-term capital to crease during the coming five to ten years. As a result, private businesses may have to postpone or abandon plans for new physical investment undertakings, thereby further reducing the prospects for meeting mediumrun national goals dependent on capital formation. Many individuals and some institutions have therefore called for public policy initiatives to bolster physical capital formation against the pressures of financial capital scarcity. Not surprisingly, proposals for change in the funding of pensions have figured prominently in these discussions. As of the end of 1975, the pension funds of private businesses and state and local governments had financial assets of $255 billion, of which $224 billion represented equity interests in or debt liabilities of U.S. corporate businesses.~ Including the roughly $40 billion of government securities in the Social Security Trust Fund, the total financial assets of pension funds amounted to some 20 percent of the combined equity and outstanding debt of the U.S. nonfinancial corporate business sector. Even with no changes in their current structure, therefore, pension funds already represent a substantial pool of financial capital invested in American industry. Furthermore, this pool is also growing rapidly. In 1975 the pension funds of private businesses and state and local governments purchased, net of sales and retirements, $24
منابع مشابه
Macroeconomic and Welfare Effects of Parametric Pension Reform in Iran
The aim of this paper is to analyze the macroeconomic effects of parametric reforms. An adjusted Auerbach-Kotlikoff model is used to study the effects of decreasing replacement and contribution rates of the pension system. The first part concentrates on the macroeconomic effect of reforms. Our results indicate that reducing the replacement and contribution rates increase the capital stock and d...
متن کاملInvestigating the effects of demographic change on the financial sustainability of the pension fund using the Overlapping Generation Model based on the DSGE model
This study examines the effects of demographic changes including decreasing fertility and increasing life expectancy and retirement age on the financial sustainability of the pension fund in Iran using the overlapping generation model and the Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium (DSGE) approach. The results of simulation and evaluation of impulse response functions and evaluation of correlati...
متن کاملU.S. Public Pension Funding and State Growth Effects
Does U.S. state pension funding affect real GDP growth rates? Do states that witness higher GDP growth also have better funded pensions? Can one expect less GDP growth when state pensions are poorly funded? My study took the funding ratio of state pension plans, the asset-to-liability ratio, and compared it with real state GDP levels. The methods I used consisted of time series panel data regre...
متن کاملPension Reform, Savings Behavior and Corporate Governance
France, Germany and Italy, to take the three largest economies in continental Europe, have large and ailing pay-as-you-go public pension systems, very thin capital markets, and low capital performance. Taking Germany as an example, we show that these three issues are closely linked. Specifically, we argue that pension reform, via a change in portfolio composition of households and a strengtheni...
متن کاملPension Risk Management with Funding and Buyout Options
There has been a surge of interest in recent years from defined benefit pension plan sponsors in de-risking their plans with strategies such as “longevity hedges” and “pension buyouts” (Lin et al., 2015). While buyouts are attractive in terms of value creation, they are capital intensive and expensive, particularly for firms with underfunded plans. The existing literature mainly focuses on the ...
متن کامل